An Examination Of The Logic of Multiculturalism
In the past couple of weeks, UKIP has had a limited exposure on the BBC. The leader, Gerard Batten was interviewed on This Week, just after Nigel Farage’s appearance on Question Time. This Week is aired around midnight. Also, Mike Hookem has been interviewed on Newsnight by Emily Maitlis (the recording of which has been doctored).
The interview with Batten was almost entirely confined to him being confronted with allegations as to his supposed involvement with Tommy Robinson (who is in fact running against UKIP in the North West region, as an independent), and with laddish remarks by another UKIP candidate who had made comments about not wanting to rape a Labour MP. During the interview, there was an intervention by the Labour MP Liz Kendall, was was angry about the rape comments. She did not consider UKIP fit to hold office.
Liz Kendall has previously acknowledged the disconnect between ordinary people and the liberal establishment (see Brexit Means Brexit, page 199), but then herself demonstrates that disconnect despite being aware of it. Liz Kendall is an MP for a party, which has communists at senior levels, despite the fact that more than 100 million were killed by communists in the 20th century (Dianne Abbott even said: ‘On balance, Chairman Mao did more good than harm … he led his country from feudalism.’ Mao was responsible for the deaths of 45 million people – see Brexit Means Brexit, page 135); which has a highly tolerant attitude towards illegal immigration, despite the fact that both al-Qaeda and ISIS – both of which have committed genocidal atrocities and mass rape – have pocketed hundreds of millions of pounds from people smuggling, as have other organized crime rackets (see The Ponzi Class, page 3); and which has a leadership that has been more than happy to cavort with and support a whole variety of terrorist and extremist organizations openly hostile to the West and the UK.
Liz Kendall’s outrage demonstrates the true face of political correctness, and it is a false morality.
The Emily Maitlis interview with Hookem was dominated by the Maitlis assertion that UKIP’s manifesto proposals to vet Muslim immigration were extremist: ‘Just let me understand that then. If I believe the Koran in a literal way, I’m not allowed in?’ and ‘That’s a specific policy, that suggests that you are going to restrict immigration from Islamic countries more than Christian ones?’ and ‘If they have a literal interpretation of Islam in their head or in their brain or in their beliefs, they won’t be allowed in?’ (this question was accompanied with face pulling) – to give some examples.
That any attempt to keep out those whose religious beliefs are incompatible with Western democracy, and who are hostile to Britain and its people, is met with allegations of being extremist, while being prepared to allow such immigrants to enter and settle in Britain is presented as being worldly and righteous, shows how degenerate Britain has become. Once again, this is the true face of political correctness and it is a false morality.