THE 2019 GENERAL ELECTION

For those who might generally believe in Turbo Brexit (and the 10 points set out below), the impending general election poses a dilemma. No party, large or small, deals with, let alone advocates, Turbo Brexit. So where does the patriotic vote go?

Neither of the three main parties (Tories, Labour, Liberal Democrats) are in the least bit concerned as to the trajectory the UK is on. They all fully embrace both political correctness and the policy of globalization. The Tories have now abandoned Brexit and advocate Brino.

The Welsh and Scots nationalists have a different agenda, but both parties are hostile to the UK and the interests of the English. They are politically correct and favour globalization. Northern Ireland remains divided, and the protestant DUP are rightly angry at being betrayed by the Tories. Northern Ireland is politically different from the British mainland.

That leaves England, where the Greens and UKIP have previously nibbled at winning seats in the House of Commons. The Greens are at least as Left-wing as Labour. UKIP has fragmented with no less than three splinters breaking away. One of those splinters, The Brexit Party, did very well in the last set of EU elections. However, The Brexit Party is proud of its commitment to both political correctness and globalization. The organization’s structure is dominated by Nigel Farage (there are only supporters with membership being restricted) who has openly dismissed concerns as to the consequences of mass immigration (with particular reference to Muslim immigrants). Farage fully supported Theresa May’s Brino policy up until after the 2017 general election. The Brexit Party offers no prospect of Turbo Brexit. The other two UKIP splinters are supportive of the Brexit Party, with the leader of one speaking in favour of Boris Johnson’s Brino deal.

As for UKIP itself, although the former leader pulled the party back from the brink of bankruptcy and dissolution, currently the newly-elected leader has just resigned after being in a power struggle with the party’s National Executive Committee for the few weeks since he was elected. The new leader and the party chairman were arguing as to who suspended who first, and an NEC election is in the process of being skewered by the NEC which is banning candidates. The recently-resigned leader stated that he was ‘powerless to prevent a purge of good members from the party’ and that he ‘had believed that UKIP was a highly democratic party, but [he had] not been able to stop political interference in UKIP ballot [and that he could] not therefore stand publicly for UKIP with a clear conscience’.

UKIP’s sole remaining peer also recently resigned citing the infighting and that UKIP ‘under its present NEC … is resisting a national debate about Islamism, which we need urgently’.

It is therefore doubtful that UKIP will be able to properly contest the general election if at all. Nonetheless, UKIP does not support the Turbo Brexit agenda and shows little inclination to do so.

There is consequently no party to vote for that will tackle the UK’s serious plight regarding both Brexit and the aftermath. What is needed is Turbo Brexit.

TURBO BREXIT

1. A complete end to the annual payments to the EU. Any post-Brexit deal should exclude any further payments to the EU. The so-called Norway Model should be rejected. From the money saved, £100million per week should be allocated to the NHS. The sooner the EU payments cease, the sooner the extra funding for the NHS is available.

2. There should be a full restoration of British sovereignty. Neither the EU, nor any other international organization, should have any power over Britain’s internal affairs. Britain’s laws should be determined by Britain’s parliament. Britain should withdraw from the jurisdiction of the European Court of Human Rights and repeal the so-called Human Rights Act.

3. Britain should regain full control over its territorial waters and those should be set at the international standard, with the fishing limit extended to 200 miles. Britain should have full control over its fishing policy and fish conservation.

4. There should be an end of free movement of people and Britain should take whatever measures are necessary to bring mass immigration to a complete end. The EU should have no say over who lives in Britain. Illegal immigrants and immigrant political extremists should be deported. This must necessitate withdrawing from the UN Convention on Refugees; help should be given to genuine refugees in their own or neighbouring countries. British citizenship should not be granted until someone has lived in Britain for at least 30 years and is someone of good standing.

5. Overseas Aid should be reduced to a minimum. The aim should be to reduce it by at least £10billion. Those who wish to give donations to overseas bodies and charities are of course free to do so with their own money.

6. Britain’s trade policy should be one of balanced trade. Britain has a massive balance of trade deficit with the EU and also with China. Britain needs to adopt trade policies that will eliminate these trade deficits. If necessary, tariffs should be used. In addition, there should be measures to prevent further key British firms being taken over by foreign entities. Other countries protect their key industries and so should Britain.

7. There should be a determined de-Marxification programme to remove the ideology of political correctness from society. Those promoting political correctness should have their access to public monies cut. Political correctness should cease to be the basis of morality and patriotism should be quietly engendered.

8. Priority should be given to reducing the government spending deficit; ending the scandal of councils seizing pensioners homes if they are taken into care; and reintroducing a fully transferable married couples tax allowance. To raise money, in addition to the extra tax income from increased growth due to trade being brought back into balance, and the savings on overseas aid and payments to the EU, there should be the introduction of a Solidarity Tax on those who have thus far avoided the extra costs of the political correctness and immigration that they so loudly demand. All organizations bringing in immigrants should be charged the full cost of a house; there is no reason why taxpayers should fund a housebuilding programme to cater for the immigrants brought in to save wages and training costs for business and other organizations; let those organizations which do so well out of immigration pay to house those immigrants.

9. The House of Lords needs to be replaced to better reflect the views of ordinary people and to cull the collection of cronies with which the chamber has been stuffed since the expulsion of most of the hereditary peers; it has become and expensive Ponzi class gravy train and is dysfunctional. There should also be the introduction of an English parliament to give the English an equal footing in Britain. The powers devolved to the various national parliaments should be equalized with a proper federal structure.

10. There should be selective measures taken to tackle crony capitalism, self-aggrandising lawyers and dishonest bankers (including their agents). Monopoly abuse should be met with fines. Lawyers should no longer be allowed to manipulate the law to their own financial advantage (e.g. orchestrating allegations from foreigners against British troops, and exploiting divorce proceedings). It should be assumed that the wealth created during a marriage is split evenly in order to simplify, make fairer and minimize lawyers’ fees. Small and medium sized businesses should have the law amended to alter the balance of power in their favour regarding banks. Bank criminality should be aggressively prosecuted.