THE ROYAL FAMILY

In The Genesis of Political Correctness: The Basis of a False Morality, I highlighted how George Lukacs, a Hungarian communist, saw the Frankfurt School as an answer to the question: ‘Who shall save us from Western Civilization?’ and that the views of those creating the Frankfurt School (who were responsible for the development of political correctness) were that the culture of Western societies was acting as a block on the communist revolution. Consequently, there was a need to undermine and ultimately destroy Western culture.

The subtitle, ‘the basis of a false morality’, is not merely a term of phrase. The point made is that the candyfloss language of political correctness and its supposed morality is all fake. The purpose of the creed is the destruction of the West and a communist revolution. It is a barbarist creed.

In The Hegemony of Political Correctness: and the rise of the woke-Right, I wrote:

‘The policies of mass immigration and multiculturalisation are front and centre of political correctness and are deeply damaging to a country as small and overpopulated as the UK … mass immigration remained received wisdom for a political establishment too feeble-minded and politically correct to defend the national interests. There is no better example than immigration and related issues to demonstrate the affliction of Political AIDs and the growth of the woke-Right.’

In The Hegemony of Political Correctness: and the rise of the woke-Right, I further wrote:

‘Political correctness acts like a political version of AIDS. It weakens a society’s culture, identity, and its ability to defend itself, thereby allowing any opportunistic, hostile entity to attack. Problems are not solved. The undermining of national culture and patriotism is as unremitting as are the intended consequences.’

Also, Political AIDs ‘weakens society’s ability to fend off hostile entities. Social cohesion and political stability are remorselessly undermined. Instead of patriotism, people are taught to hate their countries and are less willing to defend them as a result. The opposition to political correctness is reduced and becomes half-hearted.’ I further pointed out:

‘Chris McGovern, of the Campaign for Real Education, said of it, “They are brainwashing kids and trashing our past. It’s pitiful that we have planned strategy to demonise Churchill. We all know he was not perfect, but his views reflected the age in which he lived.” This comment, though true, does not acknowledge that the politically correct have to target Churchill. He is a national hero and engenders patriotism. That cannot be tolerated, and so Churchill is a target. He is targeted not because of his flaws, but because of his achievements. Citing his alleged flaws is merely the way the politically correct try to debunk his reputation.’

The same reasoning applies to the UK’s Royal Family. Its existence is a symbol of the English and British nation’s history and continuance; a symbol of patriotism and stability. Its existence is a bulwark against a communist revolution. In 2022, the Queen’s death and her burial service witnessed a surge of support and patriotism. Crowds lined the roads as the Queen’s coffin passed. Millions watched the service on television, and many millions more across the world did likewise. Recently, the coronation of King Charles III has witnessed similar widespread, determined public support.

However, regarding the King’s coronation, those in television studios have inserted a number of smears into the coverage and reporting: the Royal Family is a racist institution; their wealth is derived from slave trading; they owe reparations; they are a part of a structurally racist society; Meghan’s allegations of racism and her absence were evidence of her being a victim of racism; they are all so very White.

Many television presenters put forward the reparations issue as being an accepted fact that £trillions are owed. In reality, it is most definitely not an accepted fact. It is bunkum. It is communism at its most thieving.

The false morality of political correctness remains supreme in government and its institutions, and in wider civil society. It continues to spread. At the same time, society remains in the grip of Political AIDs and so is too feeble-minded to defend itself.

The fight between patriotism and political correctness is the fight between good and evil. It is as clear cut as that.