CULTURAL MARXISM AND THE FAMILY

• 

Arguably, the most damaging assault of cultural Marxism upon society is the attack upon the family.

The Communist Manifesto of 1848 was unequivocal in its contempt for marriage (The Genesis of Political Correctness: The Basis of a False Morality, page 31). For example:

‘Bourgeois marriage is, in reality, a system of wives in common and thus, at the most, what the Communists might possibly be reproached with is that they desire to introduce, in substitution for a hypocritically concealed, an openly legalised community of women. For the rest, it is self-evident that the abolition of the present system of production must bring with it the abolition of the community of women springing from that system, i.e. of prostitution both public and private.’

In the accompanying A Communist Confession of Faith, a series of questions were answered. Those relating to the family, nationality, and religion are revealing:

‘What will be the influence of communist society on the family? It will transform the relations between the sexes into a purely private matter which concerns only the persons involved and into which society has no occasion to intervene. It can do this since it does away with private property and educates children on a communal basis, and in this way removes the two bases of traditional marriage – the dependence rooted in private property, of the women on the man, and of the children on the parents. And here is the answer to the outcry of the highly moral philistines against the “community of women”. Community of women is a condition which belongs entirely to bourgeois society and which today finds its complete expression in prostitution. But prostitution is based on private property and falls with it. Thus, communist society, instead of introducing community of women, in fact abolishes it.’

Not only is marriage undermined, but, as stated above, the cultural Marxists (aka the politically correct) are targeting children. The indoctrination of children is a priority for all extremist ideologies (eg ISIS, Nazism, communism). In the West, the targeting is increasingly open. The aim is to impose cultural Marxism on children and to prevent the transmission of Western values from parents to their children. Children are taught to hate their countries, national heroes and Western culture, and to indoctrinate children into the belief that there are a variety of oppressed minorities.

For example, in 2008-09, there were allegedly 10,436 racist incidents in primary schools in England and Wales, another 19,223 in secondary schools, and 41 in nursery schools. The majority of incidents involved name-calling. In 51 cases, the police became involved. Under the Race Relations (Amendment) Act 2000, teachers were required to name the alleged perpetrator of such incidents, name the alleged victim, and set out the alleged incident and punishment in reports to the Local Educational Authorities. Heads who sent in ‘nil’ returns were condemned for ‘under-reporting’. The persecution schoolchildren continued under the Tory/Liberal Democrat coalition. Using terms such as ‘Chinese boy’, ‘Somalian’, ‘gay’ or even ‘girl’ can be sufficient for a child, even a nursery child, to be branded as racist, homophobic, and prejudiced. Ofsted became the government’s engine for the persecution. A village primary school in Cumbria, with only 13 pupils, was put into special measures by Ofsted, which accused the school of having too many incidents of racist and homophobic bullying, stemming from one incident of children using the term ‘gay’ in a politically incorrect way. In January 2015, two schools fell foul of Ofsted. One was put into special measures because a 10-year-old did not give a politically-correct answer to a question as to what lesbians ‘did’; the other school was told it would be closed because one child gave a politically incorrect answer to a question as to what a Muslim was. An 11-year-old girl was asked if she was a virgin.

Incredibly, even during the 2015 election campaign, it was revealed that one primary school, with children as young as three years old, required pupils to sign a contract that they must ‘Be tolerant of others whatever their race, colour, gender, class, ability, physical challenge, faith, sexual orientation or lifestyle and refrain from using racist or homophobic or transphobic language in school.’ In guidelines from the government in October 2015, children were encouraged to spy on and report fellow children for using supposedly racist or sexist language. For example, the use of the term ‘Man Up’ was deemed sexist.

During 2019 and 2020, there has been a determined effort to undermine Christian, family values. Drag queens etc have been used to this end.

For example, in the UK, the SNP MP, Mhairi Black, was criticized for visiting Glencoats Primary School in her constituency with a drag act called ‘Flowjob’. Flowjob read to pupils aged four and five. Black branded her critics as homophobes and congratulated the school for hosting a ‘great day’.

One example is Sarah Hopson, a primary school teacher from Warrington, who told the BBC that she conditions school children as young as six to accept LGBTQ ideology while they’re young and impressionable, so they’ll be less likely to accept a Christian view of sexuality later on in life: ‘The more they can be accepting of “diversity” at this age – you’re not going to face it further on, because the children will be accepting now and will be accepting this diversity around them.’ The school has introduced ‘non-gender-specific’ uniforms and its website declares that ‘any form of homophobia, transphobia and biphobia is unacceptable’, and posts a code of conduct declaring ‘respect’ for anyone’s ‘gender identity’, ‘marriage’, or ‘sexual orientation’. Young children are required to write gay love letters. BBC Radio Manchester shared a video on its Facebook page showing 6-year-olds being made to write love letters from one male story character to another male.

For example, the San Francisco-based Drag Queen Story Hour openly stated that its aim was to capture the ‘imagination and play of the gender fluidity of childhood’ and presenting the children with ‘unabashedly queer role models’. Dylan Pontiff, a Louisiana drag queen, bragged that his aim was ‘the grooming of the next generation’.

Pontiff is not the first gay or Trans activist to boast of his real intentions. For example, as far back as 1987, referring to schoolchildren, the homosexual activist, Michael Swift, wrote in the Gay Community News: ‘We shall seduce them in your schools … They will be recast in our image. They will come to crave and adore us.’ For example, in 2011 Daniel Villarreal wrote for Queerty.com:

‘Why would we push anti-bullying programs or social studies classes that teach kids about the historical contributions of famous queers unless we wanted to deliberately educate children to accept queer sexuality as normal? We want educators to teach future generations of children to accept queer sexuality. In fact, our very future depends on it. Recruiting children? You bet we are.’

For example, in 2015, Canadian gay activist Sason Bear Bergman, a woman who identifies as a transgender man, wrote an article entitled ‘I Have Come to Indoctrinate Your Children Into My LGBTQ Agenda (And I’m Not a Bit Sorry)’, in which Bergman stated: ‘I am here to tell you: All that time I said I wasn’t indoctrinating anyone with my beliefs about gay and lesbian and bi and trans and queer people? That was a lie,’ and that the aim was to make children ‘like us’ even if it ‘goes against the way you have interpreted the teachings of your religion.’

A high profile child activist, Nemis, is known as ‘Lactatia’ – a young boy who dresses as a girl. His Instagram account, written by his mother says: ‘Choose Love. Be Proud. Smash the Patriarchy and be kind to one another, always! #pride #lovenothate #loveislove #nonbinary #thefutureisfluid’. He controversially posed for a picture dressed as a girl next to a naked male drag queen.

The persecution, bullying, targeting, and corruption of children is a particularly vile aspect of cultural Marxism.

The fight between patriotism and political correctness, is the fight between good and evil. It is as clear cut as that.