THE JUDICIARY

In Brexit Means Brexit: How the British Ponzi Class Survived the EU Referendum (page 8) I pointed out that I had previously written in The Ponzi Class: Ponzi Economics, Globalization and Class Oppression in the 21^st Century: ‘Thatcher’s property-owning democracy has given way to a beds in sheds lawyers’ dictatorship’.

Later in Brexit Means Brexit, (page 178) I pointed out:

‘A shameful part of that business could be described accurately as judge-backed organized crime. Be it the fraud and malpractice of lawyers prosecuting British soldiers stemming from legal-aid-funded phoney allegations, the people smuggling industry funded by English taxpayer’s monies via an avalanche of ridiculous judgements, or the looting of small businesses by bankers and their cohorts, the judges were responsible for the growth of organized crime. This is organized crime.

Far from being reined in, the judges continued to be fawned over. As the high priests of political correctness, they retained their monopoly of the definition of the holiest of holy words: ‘human rights’. The Ponzi class therefore afforded the judges due deference. In reality, the judges were no different than primitive tribesmen in loincloths and fancy dress, dancing and whooping around a fire in the middle of the night and worshipping the moon god. Like many high priests, they were crooked and guarded their social status zealously.

Political correctness is not the definition of human rights. It should not be the basis of morality. There is no moon god, and the high priests need to be put in their place. They are just a self-serving vested interest group. Britain has remained a lawyers’ dictatorship.’

I regret that today’s Supreme Court ruling proves how accurate I was. The judiciary are a self-serving vested interest acting in their own interests.